> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://lumena.mintlify.site/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

> How Lumena uses decision markets instead of token votes to govern the protocol.

# Introduction to Futarchy

## What is futarchy?

Futarchy is a governance model first proposed by economist Robin Hanson: rather than voting on what to do, participants trade on the predicted outcome of each option. The option the market believes will produce the best result is the one that gets implemented.

Applied to Lumena: instead of token holders voting yes or no on a proposal, they trade in decision markets that answer: *"Would this proposal make the protocol more valuable, or less?"* If the market says more — the proposal passes. If less — it fails.

> Decision markets are prediction markets where the topic is directly targeted at a particular decision — asking about the consequences of a particular choice to make those market estimates and advice as directly actionable as possible.
>
> In many organizations, people pretend to be trying to collect information in order to make the best decisions overall for the organization. But what they are actually doing is a lot of politics deciding who is in which side and who has the majority of influence.
>
> — **Robin Hanson** (economist, inventor of futarchy/decision markets)

## Why it's better than token voting

Token voting has a well-documented failure mode: whoever accumulates the most tokens controls the outcome regardless of judgment or intent. Large holders can pass proposals that extract value from the protocol. Voting is free — there is no accountability for being wrong.

Futarchy changes this by requiring skin in the game. To influence a governance outcome, you put money behind your conviction. If you're wrong, you lose. This creates a strong selection effect toward honest, well-reasoned governance participation.

| **Dimension**                   | **Token Voting**      | **Futarchy (Lumena)**           |
| :------------------------------ | :-------------------- | :------------------------------ |
| Who decides                     | Largest token holders | The market aggregate            |
| Incentive to be right           | None — voting is free | **Yes — wrong bets lose money** |
| Resistant to capture            | Low                   | **High**                        |
| Requires informed participation | No                    | **Yes, to profit**              |
| **Used by Lumena**              | ✗                     | **✓**                           |

## How it works in Lumena

When a governance proposal is submitted, two decision markets open:

* **YES market:** "What is the value of Project if this proposal passes?"
* **NO market:** "What is the value of Project if this proposal fails?"

Participants trade in both markets during the proposal period.

At the end, the market pricing a higher protocol value determines the outcome and that outcome is executed onchain automatically.